化妆品原料牛脂的安全评估信息

Safety Assessment of adeps bovis Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics


原创 评估人: 李锦聪 李锦聪,化妆品违禁词网创始人,知名化妆品法规博主/媒体评论人,广东省日化商会原料安全评估专委会副主任委员等多个化妆品行业协会政策法规专委会委员,在化妆品生产质量管理、新品开发、法律法规、安全评估等领域具有15年从业经验。 日期: 0

摘要:牛脂(INCI名称:ADEPS BOVIS ;CAS号:61789-97-7 ),已被广泛应用于化妆品等个人护理品,在化妆品中使用目的为润肤剂。该原料已收录于《已使用化妆品原料目录(2021年版)》序号为04897,不属于《化妆品安全技术规范(2015年版)》中的禁用物质,参考《化妆品注册和备案检验项目要求》有关规定,对该原料的重金属、微生物、有害物质和稳定性等进行了检测。相关毒理学终点有:经口/经皮急性毒性(LD50)、皮肤和眼刺激性/腐蚀性、皮肤变态反应/致敏性、光毒性、光变态反应/光敏性、遗传毒性、重复剂量毒性/亚慢性(NOAEL/BMD)、生殖发育毒性、慢性毒性/致癌性等。该原料可能含有的风险物质为无, 按照《化妆品安全评估技术导则》的要求,基于当前科学认知水平,对牛脂可能由化妆品原料带入、生产过程中产生或带入的风险物质进行了评估。在《已使用化妆品原料目录(2021年版)》中淋洗类产品最高历史使用量为75.65%, 并且有CIR、SCCS等权威机构评估结论数据 ,美国化妆品原料评价委员会(CIR)评估结果显示,浓度不高于(淋洗类为:78 %) (驻留类为:78 %) 时, ,该原料用于化妆品是安全的。 当配方中的添加量低于该浓度时,该原料在正常、合理及可预见的使用条件下不会对人体健康造成危害。

关键词:牛脂;化妆品原料;安全评估报告;毒理学终点;权威数据;CIR;驻留类;淋洗类;最高历史使用量

评估意见:淋洗类产品相关评估数据, 驻留类产品相关评估数据, 经评估该原料满足化妆品完整版安全评估, 可根据原料在配方中实际应用浓度进行安全评估。

报送码系统中与【牛脂】相关的原料数量共计: 59
序号04897
INCI英文名称 ADEPS BOVIS
标准中文名称 牛脂
日本成分名称タロウ
韩国成分名称탈로우
CAS No61789-97-7
EC No263-099-1
可能含有的风险物质
常规使用目的润肤剂
备注
已上市产品原料使用信息
完整版安评可用20250209
国际化妆品安全评估数据索引
完整版安评可用20250410
化妆品安全技术规范要求
标签上必须标印的警告语
牙膏技术规范要求
口腔清洁护理用品工业协会
牙膏最高历史使用量(%)
仅供参考不可用
完整版安全评估报告 牛脂 完整版安全评估报告.pdf

化妆品原料主要的安全评估数据类型(完整版安评)

数据1:《化妆品安全技术规范》中的限用组分、准用防腐剂、准用防晒剂、准用着色剂和准用染发剂
数据2:国际权威化妆品安全评估机构公布的评估结论
数据3:世界卫生组织(WHO)、联合国粮农组织(FAO)等权威机构已公布的安全限量或结论
数据4:监管部门公布的已上市产品原料使用信息
数据5:化妆品“原料3年使用历史”评估要点

化妆品原料可豁免部分毒理试验和数据的方法(完整版安评)

方法1:化妆品原料“安全食用历史”评估要点
方法2:化学结构和性质稳定的高分子聚合物(具有较高生物活性的原料除外)
方法3:化妆品终产品安全性测试评估要点
方法4:毒理学关注阈值(TTC)方法评估要点
方法5:交叉参照(Read-across)方法评估要点
注意:对于无法使用上述任一证据类型的原料和/或风险物质,应按照《化妆品安全评估技术导则(2021年版)》要求的评估程序(1.危害识别 > 2.剂量反应关系评估 > 3.暴露评估 > 4.风险特征描述)进行评估证明其安全性。

全身暴露量(SED)=日均使用量 × 驻留因子 × 成分在配方中百分比 × 经皮吸收率 ÷ 体重
安全边际值(MoS) × 不确定因子(UF)= 未观察到有害作用的剂量(NOAEL/BMDL)÷ 全身暴露量(mg/kg·bw/day)
在通常情况下, 当MoS ≥ 100 × 不确定因子(UF)时,可以判定是安全的。

Assessment conclusions by international authoritative cosmetic safety assessment agencies:

ABSTRACT: The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) program Expert Panel has assessed the safety of over 1300 cosmetic ingredi ents since its inception in 1976. These safety assessments were published in the Journal of Environmental Pathology and Tox icology in 1980, the Journal of the American College of Toxi cology, from 1982 to 1996, and since then in the International Journal of Toxicology. Becauseinformationrelevanttothesafetyofingredientsmay have becomeavailable since early safety assessments were pub lished, the CIR Expert Panel has initiated a re-review process to uncover such new data. In some cases, newly available data are largely redundant with the data available in the original safety assessment. In other cases, new data present new safety issues. If after considering the newly available information, the CIR Expert Panel decides to not reopen a safety assessment, this finding, along with any background material, is summarized and announced publicly. To assure that the scientific community is aware of any new information and the decision not to reopen, this Annual Review of Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Assessments is prepared. A reference list is provided that updates the available pub lished literature and includes any unpublished data made avail able since the original safety assessment. The re-review also captures information on the industry’s current practices of in gredient use, updating the data available in the earlier report. Although this material provides the opinion of the CIR Expert Panel regarding the new data described, it does not constitute a full safety review.niclojngi

CONCLUSION: In a safety assessment of Tallow, Tallow Glyceride, Tallow Glycerides, Hydrogenated Tallow Glyceride, and Hydrogenated Tallow Glycerides (Elder 1990), the Cosmetic Ingredient Re view (CIR) Expert Panel stated that these ingredients are safe as (then) used in cosmetic products. The Expert Panel reviewed newly available studies since that assessment, along with up dated information regarding types and concentrations of use.The Panel determined to not reopen this safety assessment. There fore, the Panel confirms that Tallow, Tallow Glyceride, Tallow Glycerides, Hydrogenated Tallow Glyceride, and Hydrogenated Tallow Glycerides are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the prac tices of use and concentration, as given in Table 19.niclojngi

CITE: Annual Review of Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Assessments: 2005/2006

CIR Conclusion:S - Safe in the present practices of use and concentration. Ingredient, concentration, and use information are available in documents discoverable at CIR. Citation: JACT 9(2):153-164, 1990; IJT 27(Suppl. 1):77-142, 2008
    International Authorities:
  • Andean Community
  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
  • Caribbean Community (CARICOM)
  • East African Community (EAC)
  • Central American Customs Union (CACU)
  • Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)
  • Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)
  • European Union (EU)
  • Global Treaties
  • Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
  • Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR)
    Security Assessment Database:
  • INCI names
  • CAS numbers
  • chemical/technical names
  • additional terms will be used as appropriate
  • Pubmed
  • Toxnet(includes Toxline; HSDB; ChemIDPlus; DART; IRIS; CCRIS; CPDB; GENE-TOX)
  • Scifinder
  • wINCI
  • FDA databases
  • FDA search databases
  • EAFUS
  • GRAS listing
  • SCOGS database
  • Indirect Food Additives
  • Drug Approvals and Database
  • FDA Orange Book
  • OTC ingredient list
  • inactive ingredients approved for drugs
  • HPVIS(EPA High-Production Volume Info Systems)
  • NIOSH(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health)
  • NTIS(National Technical Information Service)
  • NTP(National Toxicology Program)
  • Office of Dietary Supplements
  • FEMA(Flavor & Extract Manufacturers Association)
  • EU CosIng database
  • ECHA(European Chemicals Agency – REACH dossiers)
  • ECETOC(European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals)
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA)
  • IUCLID(International Uniform Chemical Information Database)
  • OECD SIDS(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Screening Info Data Sets)
  • SCCS(Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety) opinions
  • NICNAS (Australian National Industrial Chemical Notification and Assessment Scheme)
  • International Programme on Chemical Safety
  • FAO(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)
  • WHO(World Health Organization) technical reports
  • Dr. Duke’s
  • Taxonomy database
  • GRIN(U.S. National Plant Germplasm System)
  • Sigma Aldrich plant profiler
  • American Herbal Products Association Botanical Safety Handbook (database)
  • European Medicines Agency Herbal Medicines
  • AGRICOLA(National Agricultural Library NAL Catalog)
  • The Seasoning and Spice Association List of Culinary Herbs and Spices
  • IFRA(International Fragrance Association)
  • RIFM(Research Institute for Fragrance Materials)
    Country Region:
  • China
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • India
  • Pakistan
  • Afghanistan
  • Iran
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Israel
  • Turkey
  • Russia
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • United Kingdom
  • Poland
  • Ukraine
  • Sweden
  • Greece
  • Egypt
  • Sudan
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Ghana
  • Morocco
  • Algeria
  • Tunisia
  • Ethiopia
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Cuba
  • Jamaica
  • Panama
  • Haiti
  • Dominican Republic
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Peru
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Venezuela
  • Uruguay
  • Paraguay
  • Bolivia
  • Ecuador
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Solomon Islands
  • Vanuatu
  • Fiji
  • Samoa
  • Kiribati
  • Nauru
  • Marshall Islands

化妆品新原料